The other day called me on the phone logic. She was upset. He said that everyone ignores. I did not know what to do. I told her that after all the millennia that have heed, though for a while 'some neglect it, not the end of the world. He hung up. Yes we say that when you get the point of maintaining that even though A is equal to B, B of A is slightly less than A is not equal to itself, perhaps slightly force the fundamental cornerstones of the Hegelian dialectic, but at least I will not say common use. Platonic, Aristotelian, diving suits, isometric. Or something like that. At the moment I do not remember, and basically I do not care either. Why so long as it is believed that when the referee signals a foul, the referee is to blame, when in fact many would feel responsible for not saying the foul, but at least those who have committed, not going anywhere, except I do not say the Moon, but at least House. Yes I know that mine is despotic populism but what can I do, I did the following: raving. Some may criticize me for being too filomonarchico because I think the logic of sovereign discourse and communication, but at least I will not say courtly sense. Others might invade my expectations of the viewer debates esteemed expectations so spectacularly comprehensive and coherent slandering my needs of correctness of logicoformale justicialism media. But what can I do. I am a person who needs the good sense of things when things are to make real good sense. For the rest I am a lover of the convulsive experiment of free stream of my ego and malformed hunchback soul. But I do not mean to offend anyone, let alone someone. Do not ever give me that the subversive Marxist. I'm just a bit 'demanding, that's all.
0 comments:
Post a Comment